- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one how to#
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one software#
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one iso#
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one professional#
Again, click on the pic for larger views:Īs you can see, Lightroom’s demoasicing quality is indeed questionable, exhibiting blurry details (the so-called “watercolor effect”) and strong color bleeding in the green/white street name sign. Lightroom/ACR recognizes the camera’s DR settings (stored as metadata in the RAW file) and automatically compensates (at least partially) for it in its default import settings. Now that our benchmark image is established, let’s have a look at its Lightroom 4.3 version. Click on it to go to Flickr for a full-size viewing option: Here’s a screenshot showing a 100% crop of this Provia JPEG. Let’s instead make this Provia JPEG our reference image and compare it with the results of three external RAW converters: Lightroom 4.3, Capture One 7.0.2 (release version) and Silkypix 5. So let’s forget about the Astia JPEG shown in the DPREVIEW article. As you can see, Provia offers less shadow contrast than Astia, so the shot looks a bit flatter and also “less sharp”, because increased contrast will give a (false) impression of increased sharpness.
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one how to#
As the demo shot was taken in DR200%, the camera’s internal RAW converter automatically adjusted shadow tones and darker midtones to compensate for the RAW’s -1 EV underexposure, while leaving the highlight tones intact (click here for a more elaborate discussion of how to extend dynamic range). This is the same file as before, now developed in-camera with the X-Pro1’s Provia film simulation mode, using the camera’s default JPEG settings:Īgain, click on the image to get to larger views on Flickr. Since Astia offers a different color gradation and more shadow contrast than the camera’s standard (default) Provia setting, this version of the demo image is actually not very suitable for comparing external RAW converters with their respective default settings, which will typically try to mimic the camera’s default settings and look. Strangely enough, Richard used a DR200% shot (= a RAW that is underexposed by 1 EV) and film simulation mode Astia. You can click on the image for larger views including full-size. This is an X-Pro1 in-camera JPEG of the original demo shot that was used in the article. Just scroll down to the end of the DPREVIEW article. You can download the RAW file of this demo shot yourself by following the link above. Yesterday, Richard Butler of DPREVIEW fame published an article comparing several X-Trans compatible RAW converters.
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one software#
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one professional#
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one iso#
The landscape photographer requires a bit of both, but for me, Capture One Pro delivers perfectly good lens correction and key-stoning and I very rarely shoot at high ISO and hence have modest noise reduction requirements. This all explains why, traditionally, DXO is favoured by architectural photographers andĬapture One Pro by fashion photographers. If you want the ultimate in noise reduction and lens correction then DXO is probably the better choice if you want superb tools, local adjustments and focus on colour then Capture One Pro would be my pick. There is really not a lot to choose between these two.
Is A Fast Media Browser That Helps You View, Organize, Manage, And Export Digital PhotosīEST: Capture One Pro 7.2.2 (48) + DXO Optics Pro 9.5 (46) You can compare Lightroom speed with Photo Mechanic